By Costa Nkomo
Human rights activists and constitutional lawyers have demanded that President Emmerson Mnangagwa honor his promise to make public the report of the Commission of Inquiry into the post election violence that left six civilians dead after soldiers opened live bullets on rioters.
This follows Mnangagwa’s spokesperson George Charamba remarks that the findings are only for Mnangagwa’s consumption.
This, however, appeared contrary to the President’s pledge when he appointed the commission in September that the findings would not be a private.
Writing on Twitter today, United Kingdom based academic Alex Magaisa said if the President expects the world to take him as a practical reformist he should not abandon his pledge like what his predecessor Robert Mugabe did on the Gukurahundi findings.
“What is beyond question is that he made a public promise in his own words. He can’t renege on that promise and expect us and the world to take him seriously.
“Look, it’s very simple. ED made a public promise. In his own words he undertook to make the report public. If he values honour the question would not even arise. He would simply stand by his words and fulfill them. It’s that simple,” Magaisa said.
University of Zimbabwe lecturer Fadzayi Mahere weighed in saying the findings should be made public to justify resources that were employed and discourage future mistakes.
“Absolutely. Unless the findings are made public, the entire jamboree was a waste of our precious taxes. We must be able to see their conclusions and scrutinize them. Lessons must be learnt to avoid military killings ever taking place in future,” Mahere wrote on Twitter today.
The opposition MDC deputy chairperson Tendai Biti described Charamba’s remarks as ridiculous and unconstitutional warning that a court of law will compel the President to release the Motlanthe report should Mnangagwa decide otherwise.
“Ridiculous and unconstitutional position. Public funds were used to fund the Commission. It is therefore not the private property of Emmerson. Any decent court would order its release on the basis of the freedom of information clause in the constitution.”